| Interview with Andrew Wolpert |
|
This interview has been made during the 2010-2011 Shakespeare year of the Steiner Seminar. Andrew Wolpert was asked by Brigitta Brassay.
"...to know a man well, were to know himself."
STEINER SEMINAR IN RUDOLF STEINER HOUSE REPORT WITH ANDREW WOLPERT,
Andrew Wolpert is different.
This year the theme of the Steiner Seminar is William Shakespeare and his works and you suggested that Shakespeare was an anthroposophist. What did you mean this?
The impulse of Renaissance Art comes out of the supersensible School of Michael that Rudolf Steiner describes in the 1924 Karma-lectures. So much of what came in Italy in Architecture, Sculpture, and Painting, came 100 years later in the Anglo-Saxon culture in Poetry and Drama, mainly through Shakespeare. All this tremendous artistic treasure is a revelation on earth through art of part of what was being celebrated and prepared by Michael and his Companions in the spiritual world, prepared for the next Age of Michael when it was brought to earth by Rudolf Steiner as Spiritual Science, as Anthroposophy. The art of the Renaissance is an open secret, so much of what had been occult knowledge reserved until then for the secret brotherhoods was now revealed through art as (maybe largely unconscious) soul nourishment, in public culture. Then in the 20th century it was Rudolf Steiner’s task to bring that wisdom in thoughts, words, ideas, as well as in the modern arts, and social deeds. And if we look at the art of the 16th century we find so much there that already points to the content of Anthroposophy, and today we are challenged to find a conscious relationship to this Michaelic substance.
How did you get connected to Hungary? And where does the idea of the Steiner Seminar come from? There were many students from Hungary at Emerson College more than 20 years ago, that was my first contact with Hungarians interested in the work of Rudolf Steiner. Georg Kuehlewind was in important individuality who created many opportunities for these contacts to be made at that time. Then life took its course, people’s paths led in different directions, and it was the about five years ago that these connections, particularly with Eva Ujlaky, Andras Gajdos and Laszlo Vargas-Semes led to conversations about how we might work together in Budapest.
What could be the purpose of a Seminar like this? Did you set out your main aims? Or in a work like this you cannot have definite ideas concerning the process of the work? We were all so glad that our work in the Seminar could be based in Rudolf Steiner House and be part of the work of the Anthroposophical Society in Hungary. The task we recognised together, and there were many additional colleagues involved, was to work in such a way that those individuals who are looking for opportunities to awaken their inner longing for Anthroposophy might find connections through our courses to their own destiny. It has never been our aim to „convert” people to Anthroposophy or persuade them about Rudolf Steiner.
What were the themes of your former Seminars and maybe you already have plans for the next year as well?
I am glad to be known through my work. My love of Anthroposophy became the most important element in my life when I was in my twenties. I had been to a Waldorf school and enjoyed the benefits of being brought up by loving parents who recognised the significance of who Rudolf Steiner was, but my own conscious connection to all this awoke when I began to work with the Philosophy of Freedom forty years ago. Again, it was my parents who took me to Italy as a child and where I first encountered all the art, and it was thirty years ago when I began to discover how intimately connected the Christian Heart of Anthroposophy is with all that poured into our culture during the Renaissance.
I mention this „wondeful combination” because Rudolf Steiner speaks a lot about the artistic element that needs to get involved into the process that helps Anthroposophy being realized on Earth. What do you think? What is this artistic element? Is that art itself or something deeper? Artistic activity lives in the rhythms of time, and a vital part of our work in the Steiner Seminar has been to offer music, eurythmy, drama, recitation, painting, modelling and Bothmer Gymnastics as fully integrated process that complement the cognitive and cerebral challenges. Engaging in such creative activities does not have the aim of making us into professional artists, but rather of allowing the artist that slumbers in each of us to come to healthy organic expression through the life-supporting rhythms of time and repeated opportunities to develop confidence and new competance. This is all about doing art. Looking at art is a different process, but it also needs time and the support of repeated rhythmical processes.
It is not for me to say what the students got from these courses, but I certainly can say that asking for and listening to their comments and suggestions enabled us in the last three years to change and re-organise both the structure and sometimes the content of our work. This co-operation is an essential aspect of modern adult education. Honest discussion is vital.
The theme of the Seminar on Friday and on Saturday is not the same as on Sundays, can you say a little about this? We knew that it was not easy for all our students to commit to a full weekend and so we are offering the Shakespeare on Fridays and Saturdays. We also wanted to offer a theme on Sundays that would more explicitly address the deeper questions of those who already have a more conscious connection to Anthroposophy and the Anthroposophical Society. All three days are open to everybody, and some participants come for the whole weekend, some just for Fridays, some for Fridays and Saturdays, and some just on Sunday mornings. I like this eclectic freedom. If you look at our website you will see we plan to continue this structure next year. The interesteing aspect of this, not unexpected but also not planned, is that the work on Sundays very often reveals inner connections with some of the themes we have been busy with in the Shakespeare.
It is wonderful to discover that working with similar themes in different places, with different people and in different languages and cultures again and again reveals the universally human, the essential qualities of what people are looking for today. Of course the differences have their effects and invite appropriately different ways of working, but the far more significant reality is that in the Spirit of our Time we are working with the questions and challenges that can be recognised as living in striving individuals wherever they are on the earth. Yes, the travelling can be tiring, but it never gets less exciting, and you manage to develop strategies to deal with airports, you learn to travel light, and even routine routes hold delighful surprises.
Please, tell me something about those processes that are growing and developing in you in connection with those subjects you work with. How a particular theme that you are engaged with, for example the theme of the Parzival, moves in your soul during the years? My first encounter with Parzival was seeing eurythmy performances of the story regularly every year as a child in London. Now I have been working with the story and exploring its themes, symbolism, historical aspects and spiritual wisdom for more than thirty years. Sometimes people ask for a month’s course on it, sometimes just one lecture, so I have had to become versatile and creative in my approach. That is an outer factor that keeps it alive. Another precious aspect of this work is that whenever a group of people become engaged with this story all sorts of questions arise, that’s the nature of this topic. Some questions seem to come again and again, but that doesnt mean they always want the same answer, the context might be different, the mood of the questioner is so significant. And most delightfully of all are the questions that I have never heard before, and they come, each time, new questions, questions that invite to me take a fesh look at aspects of the story, questions that oblige me to rethink certain interpretations. The participants on these courses really are my colleagues who give me the opportunity to find new meanings and fresh insights. And of course, each time I re-read the story I discover details that didnt make so much impression on previous readings. And as with the Shakespeare, the great archetypes and peculiar details of this story are ready to reveal connections with whatever else you might be busy with, whether it is a lecture by Rudolf Steiner or a newspaper article, it is an endless source of inspiration. „We have to live in this world but not for this world” – thats what you said once. How can we achieve this? What does this mean? We come to this earthly world (which is an expression of the spiritual world) in order to know the spiritual world and in order in freedom to develop what the spiritual world is waiting for from us. It is only on earth that we can find a free relationship to Christ and our spiritual destiny, we have to be fully incarnated in this world to be able to realise the next stage of our spiritual evolution. So we have to live in this world, but for our greater potential that lies beyond this world. But, if we know that, then we will also be able to contribute to the transformation of this earth, and then our spiritual strivings will also be for the redemtion of this world. Christ’s relationship to the Earth and to this world is the great archetype which inspires our own quest to live truly this life we have chosen.
Thank you for this conversation!
|